✨ Introduction

Diffusion models have become the foundation of modern generative modeling, powering text-to-image systems like Stable Diffusion and DALL·E. Yet, the mechanism by which these models generate diverse yet realistic samples remains somewhat mysterious.

In our recent work, Controllable and Constrained Sampling (CCS), we uncover a surprisingly simple but powerful property underlying diffusion sampling—a widely existing linearity between the input and output during DDIM sampling.


🔍 The Hidden Linearity in DDIM Sampling

DDIM (Denoising Diffusion Implicit Models) sampling is often viewed as a nonlinear iterative denoising process. However, when we analyze the mapping between the initial noise (x_T) and the final generated sample (x_0), we find an almost linear relationship between change of outputs and change of inputs:

Empirically, this linearity is strikingly consistent across datasets, models, and sampling steps — indicating that DDIM sampling acts like a linear transformation in the high-dimensional data space.


🎛️ Controlling Samples through Linearity

This linear structure has deep implications.
Because the output (x_0) depends linearly on the input (x_T), we can directly control the generation process by perturbing the initial noise in a principled way.

Example: Controlling the Mean and MSE

  • Sample Mean Control:
    By shifting (x_T) in a known direction, we can predictably adjust the mean of generated samples.

  • Sample MSE Control:
    By scaling or projecting noise components, we can constrain the output variance or reconstruction error—without retraining the model.

In effect, CCS turns a black-box sampler into a controllable generator with explicit, mathematically interpretable levers.


🧭 Linearity as a Window into Data Distribution

Beyond controllability, linearity reveals something fundamental about the model’s understanding of the data.

When we test the same sampling process on out-of-distribution (OOD) data, the linear correlation between (x_T) and (x_0) sharply deteriorates.

This suggests that:

  • High linearity corresponds to data within the training distribution.
  • Low linearity flags OOD or underrepresented regions.

Thus, linearity becomes not just a control signal—but a diagnostic tool for understanding the geometry of the learned data manifold.


🌌 Why CCS Matters

  • Training-free: CCS requires no additional model training or architectural changes.
  • Generalizable: Works across diverse diffusion backbones (e.g., Stable Diffusion, DiT, Video Diffusion).
  • Interpretable: Provides a physics-like view of how information flows through the generative process.
  • Diagnostic: Offers new metrics for measuring model robustness and data coverage.

For details check our paper at: https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.04670

Concept Description
Observation DDIM sampling exhibits near-linear mapping from initial noise to output.
Implication Enables direct control over sample mean, MSE, and other statistics.
Insight Linearity reflects model’s internal understanding of the data distribution—lower for OOD data.
Contribution CCS provides a unified, training-free framework for controllable and constrained sampling.


<
Previous Post
A bug when installing new environment in Conda
>
Blog Archive
Archive of all previous blog posts